|Derrick Ferguson posted in Condemn Zionism|
This recording was made in 1967. Mr. Myron C. Fagan gives documentary evidence on how the ILLUMINATI became the instrument of the House of Rothschild in their endeavor to achieve a “One World Government”. He uncovers many plots of historical events. All this makes chilling listening! What he speaks of way back in the ’60s is truly coming to fruition as we speak. World War Three comments begin at 38-minute mark.
Quotes from the Synagogue of Satan
Newly revealed documents obtained by Haaretz tell the long-hidden story of what Ben-Gurion described as a ‘horrific atrocity’: In August 1949 an IDF unit caught a Bedouin girl, held her captive in a Negev outpost, gang-raped her, executed her at the order of the platoon commander and buried her in a shallow grave in the desert. Twenty soldiers who took part in the episode, including the platoon commander, were court-martialed and sent to prison.
Ben-Gurion told Nahum Goldman (one of the prominent Zionists leaders) before he died:
“I don’t understand your optimism,” Ben-Gurion declared. “Why should the Arabs make peace? If I was an Arab leader I would never make terms with Israel. That is natural: we have taken their country. Sure, God promised it to us, but what does that matter to them? Our God is not theirs. We come from Israel, it’s true, but two thousand years ago, and what is that to them? There has been anti-Semitism the Nazis, Hitler, Auschwitz, but was that their fault? They only see one thing: we have come here and stolen their country. Why should they accept that? They may perhaps forget in one or two generations’ time, but for the moment there is no chance. So it’s simple: we have to stay strong and maintain a powerful army. Our whole policy is there. Otherwise the Arabs will wipe us out”.
Ben Gurion was naive enough to think that the Palestinians would “forget” their country in one or two generations – they will NEVER FORGET and they will continue to fight APARTHEID until Israel goes the way of South Africa.
First Yassir Arafat was a threat, then Hamas. And after Hamas, it was Iraq and now Iran is the greatest threat to Israel survival and WHO WILL BE NEXT? There don’t seem to be an ending of the so-called threats, WHERE DOES IT STOP? If you do not want to live your whole life with fear you must not treat the Palestinians like enemies. Now let me share with you what Salah Mansour said when I told him that if Netanyahu agrees to release control of the water supply in the West Bank and follow Singapore’s example then a 2 state solution can be a reality. This was his reply.
Dear Mr. Chong,
When Singapore agreed for the division of the country; you didn’t ethnically cleanse nor dispossessed the majority, did you? Of course not.
We, the Palestinian people, still own and used to operated 95% of Palestine as of 1948. Israelis mostly immigrated escaping European racism and we paid for the Holocaust; not you not any European; when we were forcibly driven out of our homes, farms, and businesses.
Don’t listen to our politicians; they have been mostly bought; the good ones are either dead or in jail. So the two-state solution is fiction; and at best it is temporary. Our politician (especially Abbas and his goons in the PLO) have been corrupted and they tell their people one thing and tell the Israelis and the Americans a different thing so they keep collecting Western donations; so politically they have been bankrupt.
Our DATE is 64 years LATE,
we shall return.
Salah Mansour (Abu al-Sous) is the author and administrator of PalestineRemembered.com
Let me share with you Ben-Gurion the Zionist thought.
The concept of “transferring” European Jews to Palestine and “transferring” the Palestinian people out is central to Zionism. Ben-Gurion, the 1st Israeli Prime Minister, eloquently articulated this essential Zionist pillar, he stated in 1944:
“Zionism is a TRANSFER of the Jews. Regarding the TRANSFER of the [Palestinian] Arabs this is much easier than any other TRANSFER. There are Arab states in the vicinity . . . . and it is clear that if the [Palestinian] Arabs are removed [to these states] this will improve their condition and not the contrary.” (Expulsion Of The Palestinians, p. 159)
When a “Jewish majority” was impossible to achieve based on Jewish immigration and natural growth, Zionists had concluded that forcible “population transfer” (Ethnic Cleansing) http://palestinebedrockoftheworld.com/the-ethnic-cleansing-of-palestine/ was the only solution to what they referred to as the “Arab Problem.” To excuse the “Jewish state” from any WAR CRIMES perpetrated against the Palestinian people (specially the ones committed during the 1948 war), Zionists have concocted a myth that the Palestinian people had willingly left their homes, farms, and businesses, and as a result they have forfeited their right to return.
I got this response from a Palestinian living in Germany on why he can’t support my petition for a Palestinian State.
Please excuse if I refuse to sign the petition, because I don’t support the idea of 2 states for 2 nations, or a Palestinian state (because it will be a joke) on less that 18% of historical Palestine. I think the only solution is a democratic state for both nations.
Please understand my point of view!
I am a positive thinker and I want to believe that a 2 state solution can be a reality but sometime fact on the ground tells us a different story – http://www.asa.org.uk/ASA-action/Adjudications/2012/3/Israeli-Government-Tourist-Office/SHP_ADJ_179845.aspx A national press ad, for a book on Northern Israel and tourism in the region, viewed in November 2011, was headed “IN THE BEGINNING”. The ad covered three pages. The first page showed an image of the book and the Israel Ministry of Tourism logo. The following double page spread was headed “WELCOME TO NORTHERN ISRAEL,” and included a map and text describing the history and attractions of Northern Israel. The map showed the northern section of land highlighted in green and a dotted line around the Golan Heights area, labelled “GOLAN”. The remainder of the land on the map was grey and there were dotted lines around the Gaza Strip, labelled “GAZA”, and West Bank areas. The northern and southern parts of the West Bank were labelled “SAMARIA,” and “JUDEA,” respectively. Further text on the second page of the ad stated “Prehistoric skeletons found in the Galilee show that in this place, man developed the ability to speak.”
The Zionist Jews are living the legacy of their founder Ben Gurion or making sure his legacy become a reality. But this is a new world, thus their founder Ben-Gurion legacy is not right for this world and in fact it is dividing our world and if we do not addressed it our world will be torn apart beyond repair. Therefore, to start anew the Jewish people got to leave their founder legacy behind and most Jewish people are ready to do so but unfortunately the Zionist Jews are adamant to keep his legacy alive and that is to drive the Palestinians out of Palestine. Since the occupation of Jerusalem, Israeli authorities have revoked the residency rights of 14,561 Palestinians. Jerusalem’s Mayor has declared that Palestinians living outside of the wall will be transferred to the West Bank civil administration resulting in a further 70,000 individuals being effectively barred from the city. Meanwhile, Israel is planning to demolish homes in Silwan neighbourhood – evicting over 1,000 Palestinian residents – the biggest mass demolition planned since 1967.
If America and the world still refuse to accept this fact then we will be taking a merry go round maybe for another 60 years and by then the whole of Palestine will be known as Israel. The never ending suffering of the Palestinians will continue and their people will live in total misery and despair! Do the world want that to happen to A PEOPLE WHO HAD DONE NO WRONG TO THE JEWS!
How can the world just watches and allows the Netanyahu government to carry out all the inhumane act to the Palestinian people in broad daylight? I will share with you a short paragraph on why Israel attacked Gaza from PalestineChronicle.com
“The Palestinians were mentioned in a different context, and repeatedly so. Ephraim Kam, for example, expected that thousands of rockets would rain on Israel from Hezbollah, Hamas and Iran itself. The Associated Press quoted Vice Prime Minister Dan Meridor as saying, “The whole of Israel (is vulnerable to) tens of thousands of missiles and rockets from neighboring countries. If there is a war […] they are not just going to hit Israeli soldiers. The main aim is at civilian populations” (Feb 20).
Per this logic, the only way to prevent rockets from reaching Israel is by attacking Iran. An independent Israeli commentator, Yossi Melman predicted that a weakened Iran “would undoubtedly have an impact on Hamas and Hezbollah” (CNN, March 9).”
Analysis: Why Israel attacked Gaza
Published Thursday 15/03/2012 (updated) 15/03/2012 19:44
By Ramzy Baroud
The first Israeli missile sped down to its target, scorching the Gaza earth and everything in between. Palestinians collected the body parts of two new martyrs, while Israeli media celebrated the demise of two terrorists.
Zuhair Qasis was the head of the Popular Resistance Committee. He was killed alongside a Palestinian prisoner from Nablus, who had recently been freed and deported to Gaza.Then, another set of missiles rained down, this time taking Obeid al-Ghirbali and Muhammad Harara.Then, a third, and a forth, and so on. The death count began on March 9 and escalated through the day. The Hamas government urged the international community to take action. Factions vowed to retaliate.In these situations, Western media is usually clueless or complicit. Sometimes it’s both. The Israeli army was cited readily by many media outlets without challenge.The first round of attacks was justified based on a claim that Qasis was involved in the planning of an attack that killed seven Israelis last year. The Israel army didn’t even bother to upgrade that claim – which already resulted in the killing and wounding of many Palestinians.Even Israeli media had drawn the conclusion that the attack then originated from Egypt, and no Palestinian was involved.Al Jazeera reported that some of the victims were decapitated, a familiar scene in most of Israel’s unforgiving atrocities.
Expectantly, Palestinians fired back. “The national resistance brigades, the DFLP’s armed wing, the Al-Aqsa brigades, and the armed wing of the PRC, the An-Nasser Salah Ad-Din brigades, have all claimed responsibility for rocket fire,” reported Ma’an news agency.
The incessant Israeli provocations would not have been enough to end the months-long truce. Palestinians know that Israeli provocations are often, if not always, politically motivated. This time however, the people killed were leaders in al-Muqawama, the local resistance parties. Neither Hamas’ might nor diplomacy could persuade Gaza’s many factions to hold their fire. Israel knows this fact more than any other party. This is why it sent such unmistakably bloody messages.
Israel needed Palestinians to respond, and urgently so. But why did Israel decide to ignite trouble again?
To answer the question, one needs to make a quick stop in Washington. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had recently tried to articulate a case for war against Iran there. Unlike the successful effort to isolate and strike and invade Iraq in 2003, the Iran war campaign is not going according to plan.
The Israelis are desperate to see Iran’s nuclear facilities bombed by American bunker buster bombs – some of which weigh up to 13,600 kilograms. Israel’s former head of military intelligence, Amos Yadlin, assured the “free world” — a term often manipulated by Netanyahu — that a bombing campaign can succeed if it’s followed by the right measures. “Iran, like Iraq and Syria before it, will have to recognize that the precedent for military action has been set, and can be repeated,” he wrote (as cited in CNN, March 9).
There is growing consensus in Israel that “something has to be done” – at least to set back Iran’s uranium enrichment by few years, per the assurances of deputy director of the Israeli Institute for National Security Studies, Ephraim Kam. Republican candidates in the US, and even President Obama himself, agree. But Obama, despite his groveling at the recent AIPAC conference, dared to question the timing and the way in which Iran must be brought to its knees.
The US president is becoming increasingly isolated within Washington because of his stance on Iran.
It is election year, and Israel knows that a window of opportunity will not be open for long. “Netanyahu won a crucial battle in Washington this past week. No one brought up the Palestinians. Netanyahu has quite masterfully shifted the conversation to the subject of Iran,” wrote Jeffrey Goldberg in The Atlantic (March 9). He is right, of course, but only within the context of “peace process” and conflict resolution.
The Palestinians were mentioned in a different context, and repeatedly so. Ephraim Kam, for example, expected that thousands of rockets would rain on Israel from Hezbollah, Hamas and Iran itself. The Associated Press quoted Vice Prime Minister Dan Meridor as saying, “The whole of Israel (is vulnerable to) tens of thousands of missiles and rockets from neighboring countries. If there is a war […] they are not just going to hit Israeli soldiers. The main aim is at civilian populations” (Feb 20).
Per this logic, the only way to prevent rockets from reaching Israel is by attacking Iran. An independent Israeli commentator, Yossi Melman predicted that a weakened Iran “would undoubtedly have an impact on Hamas and Hezbollah” (CNN, March 9).
Yes, the Palestinians were infused plenty in Israeli war rhetoric. They were liberally presented as the jackals who would pounce on vulnerable Israel. Who would dare challenge this tired victimization narrative? Who would have the audacity to point out the fact that Israel has the region’s strongest army, equipped with hundreds of fully-functioning nuclear heads, while Palestinians fighters — who had until recently respected the truce, although Gaza’s siege was never lifted — are armed with light weapons?
No one in the mainstream media, of course. But then, as the supposed threat has reached an all time high, Hamas spokesperson in Gaza, Fawzi Barhoum told AP: “Hamas weapons and the weapons of the Palestinian resistance, in general, are humble weapons that aim to defend and not to attack, and they are to defend the Palestinian people […] that does not give us the ability to be part of any regional war.”
Hamas has its own calculations independent of Israel’s war momentum. But losing Hamas would jeopardize the very equation Israel has been constructing for years. The “radical camp” must remain intact, as far as Israel is concerned. No political polarization caused by the so-called Arab Spring will be allowed to endanger the Israeli narrative: the radicals, the evil alliance, the threat facing the “free world” and all the rest. Great resources were spent on spinning the perfect story to justify a preemptive war.
Then, on March 9, less than two days after Barhoum made his comments of “humble weapons,” heads began to roll in Gaza. Literally. And the media machine resumed its work unabashed. “Gaza rockets fire disrupts life in Israeli south,” read a headline in Israel’s Haaretz. “IDF strikes Gaza terror targets following rocket barrage,” declared another in The Jerusalem Post. It’s war all over again. Israeli civilians run to shelters. Sirens blare. US media reports the fate of “besieged” Israelis and Palestinian “terrorists.”
It matters little to them that it was Israel itself that stirred the trouble, broke the truce, and fanned the flames.
Ramzy Baroud is an internationally syndicated columnist and the editor of PalestineChronicle.com