Home / Israel's Survival in Question? / GONE WITH THE WIND ISRAEL!
GONE WITH THE WIND ISRAEL!

GONE WITH THE WIND ISRAEL!

MY CHILDHOOD THE STONE

 

NYT obit of rabbi left out his urging Sharon: ‘Very simply, wipe them out’

The report includes some shocking quotes from the late Rabbi David Hartman, which appeared in the Washington Post in March 1, 2002, at the height of the Second Intifada, when he urged Prime Minister Ariel Sharon to be more brutal:

“Which population in the world would allow itself to be intimidated and terrified as this whole population is, where you can’t send your kid out for a pizza at night without fear he’ll be blown up?” said David Hartman, a rabbi and philosopher who runs a think tank in Jerusalem. “The frustration is, ‘Sharon, we thought you’d show our power.”
“Let’s really let them understand what the implication of their actions is. . . . Very simply, wipe them out. Level them.”

Mohamed Khodr: Does Israel Have the Legal Right to Exist? ~ Sabbah Report

DEFINITELY NOT BECAUSE THEY ARE FAKE JEWS!

1) THE JEWISH DNA IS “FAKE JEW”. IF THE ZIONIST JEWS CLAIMED ISRAEL IS A JEWISH STATE THEN THE FIRST ONE TO PACK THEIR BAGS IS THE ZIONIST JEWS BECAUSE THEY ARE THE KHAZAR’S WAR LORD PEOPLE!

2) BECAUSE THE GREEDY ZIONIST ROTHSCHILD WANT 100% OF PALESTINE! FROM A PEOPLE WITH NO LAND THE ZIONIST JEWS HAD STOLEN MORE THEN 80% THROUGH DECEIT AND VIOLENCE AND STILL THEY WANT MORE! SO WHERE ARE THEY GOING TO HOUSE THE 4 MILLION AND MORE PALESTINIAN PEOPLE?

TELL THE WORLD WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO TO THE PALESTINIANS, KILL THEM ALL!!

 

Post by End the Israel Lobby.

WE, THE CITIZENS OF THE WORLD WILL NOT ALLOW ISRAEL TO START WW3 BECAUSE WE GOT THE THE BRICS, AND THEY WILL SAVE OUR ONE WORLD!

THESE EVIL ZIONIST JEWS KNOW NO LIMIT THEY EVEN WANT THE WHOLE WORLD UNDER THEIR CONTROL. WHAT UTTER RUBBISH THEY MUST BE OUT OF THEIR CRAZY MIND!! ON TOP OF IT THEY WANT TO POISON US BY MONSANTO GMO!!

THE INTERNET HAS EXPOSED ALL THE ZIONIST JEWS EVILNESS AND ESPECIALLY THE POISON BLOG http://thepoisonappleoftheworld.com/ IS PROOF OF IT. WITHOUT THE INTERNET YES THE EVIL ZIONIST JEWS CAN CONTINUE THEIR INHUMANE ACTS BUT NOW WE GOT THE INTERNET THEY CANNOT HIDE FROM US BY CHANGING THEIR JEWISH NAME AND LIE TO US ANYMORE! WE MUST CONTINUE TO FIGHT FOR JUSTICE FOR ALL! THIS IS WHAT IS EXPECTED FROM US BY ALMIGHTY GOD!!

MANY JEWS CALL ME A JEW-HATER!

David A Levy 2:25pm May 2
Sunflower, wht you have posted is not history but rather a twisted version of history through the sick and perverted mind of a jew hater

its the kind of history that neo-Nazis love

are you a neo- Nazi?

Nancie Brg 9:29am May 2
They know their history better than you do I think. Probably me, too. The persecution of the Revisionist? you mean palestinian revisionists? I have seen their handywork..debunked much of it.

Ben Zion 11:21pm Apr 27
‫ימח שמך וזכרך‬

Sunflower Chong 9:46pm Apr 25
Never mind got many Israeli flags visiting the site. Once the Israelis know more about their history they will right the wrong of their governmenthttp://www.palestinebedrockoftheworld.com/albert-einstein-said-no-to-a-jewish-state/

David A Levy 9:33pm Apr 25
heck, your pathetic hate site has even got nazi Quotes

JOSEPH GOEBBELS SAID:“There will come a day, when ALL the lies will collapse under their own weight and TRUTH will again Triumph.”
Read more at http://thepoisonappleoftheworld.com/israel-we-are-sick-of-your-lies/

David A Levy 9:31pm Apr 25
yes I’ve looked at that ridiculous site Sunflower

it filled with stupid childish lies and utter hatred

are you normally so easily fooled?

What I have posted is twisted version of history. Poland (1942 – ’43)

Volume XV, Leaf 87

April, 2014

Poland (1942 – ’43)

“I came to Auschwitz with my Jewish parents already in 1942, where we were separated. After that, I never saw them again.

“I must have been about 13 at the time, and was promptly put to work. Auschwitz was a huge place in those days, with many different jobs for people of every age and skill. I was provided with a kind of rasp, with which to roughen one side of a sheet of leather (~ 45 cm X ~30 cm) which had several circles (~7 – 10 cm) neatly punched out of it. I guessed this was intended to be used as a kind of gasket. Suffice it that the work-day was long and tedious; the ‘accommodations’ minimal in every respect, but we could purchase some amenities using the camp Scrip, with which we were paid monthly. We were told that, after the war, we would be rewarded and granted our freedom.

“The ‘atmosphere’ at Auschwitz began to change during the winter of 1942-43. It was apparent from the expression and behaviour of the Camp’s officers and staff that, for them, the war was not going well. At this time, too, we observed a number of experiments intended to increase various aspects of the Camp’s efficiency.

“One morning, for example, we arose to see a black plastic (?) tent being erected in the open space before a barracks for senior laborers. That same evening, on returning from our shift, we noted the tent’s peculiar dimensions. It appeared to be no more than 3 meters high, about 4 meters across each end — which opened to a single flap — and perhaps 25 meters in length.

“We were granted only few hours during which to speculate on the purpose of this strange tent, for — by the following morning — we found labourers, guards, and officers already at work on what was to prove the supporting structure for a 3-meter wide conveyor belt, running from the seniors’ barracks through the length of the tent, and on to a line of elevated steel racks (beneath which piles of wood were observed gradually to accumulate). Altogether, this transport system must have extended at least 150 meters, and quite possibly more. It was powered by a single noisy Diesel engine, running at a constant speed, which moved the belt rather faster than the average man can walk.

“Of course, we had no access to the area in which this experiment was run. Consequently, I can tell you only what we saw from a distance of 50 and more meters away, and what we concluded from those observations.

“The belt was ‘loaded’ with perhaps two dozen recumbent figures. Most appeared to be capable of movement, though not of locomotion. We believed that these were, for the most part, sick and/or elderly Jews who were no longer capable of contributing to the fascist war effort. When the Diesel was started and the conveyor began to move, some of these pathetic figures began to roll about uncontrollably. Accordingly, guards had to be posted about four meters apart, along the entire route, to prevent figures from falling off.
Most of these creatures continued to flail about until they disappeared into the black tent. Upon their re-emergence at the other end, all motion had ceased. We concluded that, at the heart of this tent, there lay either a homicidal gas chamber, or some other infernal fascist machine — e.g., a ‘death ray’ — dedicated to the same purpose.

“At the beltway’s terminus, bodies were dumped unceremoniously on the ground, where they tended to accumulate. It soon proved necessary to shut the system down until corpses could be lifted atop the crematory grill. It required at least 24 hours and an immense stockpile of wood (including carts and furniture) to consume a single body, after which a more or less intact skeleton remained. This had to be laboriously broken up with steel rods.

“The experiment continued for several days, but was eventually abandoned when it became inescapable that effective disposal required far more modern, coke-fired ovens than were ever likely to be made available.”

* * *

We have all read innumerable personal accounts of the “holocaust,” some longer and more plausible that this, others perhaps shorter and less persuasive than the current example. For the fact is that the overwhelming majority of “evidence” for a holocaust of Jews during W.W. II comes from anecdotes more or less comparable to this one. Moreover, so inadequate is the forensic evidence assembled in an effort to portray Hitler, Himmler, Goebbels, et al., as “monsters” that many European nations have made it illegal to express even the slightest doubt regarding the veracity of such tales.

So, what do you think? Did the Germans murder 6 million Jews, exactly as they claim? Do you believe the events described in this report occurred substantially as described, or might they have been fabricated? In either case, what in – your opinion – was the purpose in writing them? Has this article altered your thinking about “the holocaust”? Are you of the opinion that anyone who expresses scepticism about any aspect of “the holocaust” belongs in prison?

Toshiyori looks forward to reading your comments. Respondents need not reveal their identity. In Leaf 88, he will disclose the origin of this of this report.

 

In Gassho,
Toshiyori.

IF ZIONIST ISRAEL STILL REFUSED TO COMPROMISED THEN NO MORE ISRAEL FOR SURE!

Liberal Zionists and rightwingers shed differences in effort to save the Jewish state

Philip Weiss on February 14, 2014

(Photo: Sun Sentinel)

The Israel Policy Forum has sent a letter to Netanyahu supporting John Kerry’s framework. The signatories represent a “broad cross-section of the American Jewish community,” and the letter is a nudge-nudge to Netanyahu to do the right thing, because Israel is at risk:

We believe Secretary Kerry’s determined diplomatic effort offers an unprecedented opportunity to ensure Israel’s security, to enhance its prosperity, and to avoid the existential threat to the Jewish state posed by bi-nationalism.

What I find most remarkable is that Israel-right-or-wrong folks like Alan Dershowitz, Barney Frank, Lester Crown of the Council on Foreign Relations, Charles Bronfman (funder of Birthright Israel) and Michael Adler of AIPAC signed up alongside liberal Zionists like Peter Joseph and Roly Matalon and Neil Barsky (partnered with Bill Keller on a new liberal criminal-justice website). And let’s call David Axelrod a liberal Zionist. And all at the behest of a group that was once liberal Zionist and employed MJ Rosenberg.

What this demonstrates is that as the two-state paradigm crumbles inside our discourse, the lobby will cease to be divided and everyone will be “liberal Zionists,” in the sense that they are seeking to pressure the Israeli government, even AIPAC. And all will be “rightwing Zionists” in the sense that they’re raising fears about a binational state and saying nothing about Palestinian human rights. In short, we are approaching a period in which American Zionists will be called upon to say how important a Jewish state is to them, and if it’s important, put aside your differences and sing out in one voice. Roger Cohen’s angry denunciation of BDS is in this category; he really cares deeply about the Zionist dream.

My disappointment here is that good liberals like Barsky and Matalon are signing on. Though I predict that the great payoff of the period we’re approaching is that some of the liberal Zionists are going to shed their Zionism entirely– as Communists ran for the exits in the 1950s– because it’s anachronistic, or because it has never relieved Palestinian discrimination, for one second, or because they’ve been publicly shamed. And then good folks like Peter Beinart will ultimately come out against Zionism. His book of two years ago The Crisis of Zionism was prompted, he writes in the introduction, by a horrifying scene on the West Bank, from 2010. Well those conditions haven’t changed; families are still being torn apart and arrested because they dare to resist settlers’ incursions. And how long can an ideology be in crisis before you say it’s bankrupt?

Here’s the letter.

Dear Prime Minister Netanyahu:

At this critical juncture for the Israeli-Palestinian negotiations, we write to express the sentiment of a broad cross-section of the American Jewish community in support of your continued efforts to pursue a negotiated resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict based on two states for two peoples.

As American advocates for a strong, Jewish and democratic Israel, we have been heartened by Secretary of State John Kerry’s extraordinary resolve to advance this process consistent with America’s unwavering commitment to Israel’s security. We believe Secretary Kerry’s determined diplomatic effort offers an unprecedented opportunity to ensure Israel’s security, to enhance its prosperity, and to avoid the existential threat to the Jewish state posed by bi-nationalism.

It is our hope that President Mahmoud Abbas will join you in demonstrating leadership to advance these talks. By moving forward at this time, we believe that the Palestinian leadership will be challenged to make important compromises, to end incitement and to demonstrate a genuine preparedness to live in peace alongside the nation-state of the Jewish people.

Mr. Prime Minister, at this pivotal moment of decision-making, we offer our support and encouragement as you move forward to pursue a lasting agreement that will protect Israel’s security as a homeland for the Jewish people.

Sincerely,

Daniel H. Adler Lawrence C. Gottlieb Alan J. Patricof
Karen R. Adler Fred Gould Richard Pearlstone
Michael M. Adler Laurence Greenwald Debra Pell
Harold Akselrad Jeffrey Gural Bettina Plevan
David Avital Rabbi Steve Gutow Isaac Putterman
David Axelrod David A. Halperin Steve Rabinowitz
Neil Barsky Harold R. Handler Debra L. Raskin
Robert A. Belfer J. Ira Harris Marcia Riklis
Jack C. Bendheim Andrew Hauptman Ed Robin
Karyn Bendit Oren Heiman Elliott H. Rose
Michael Berenbaum Jeff Hoffman Lenore Ruben
Howard M. Bernstein Rabbi Rick Jacobs Kerry Rubinstein
James J. Binns Alan S. Jaffe Rabbi Peter J. Rubinstein
Edward Blank Peter A. Joseph David Sable
Herb Blecker Rabbi Jeremy Kalmanofsky Richard A. Salomon
Edward Bleier Gerald D. Katcher David Sands
Ellen Block Nancy K. Kaufman Rabbi David Saperstein
Stanley Bogen Francine Klagsbrun Rabbi Yehuda Sarna
Charles R. Bronfman Samuel Klagsbrun Rabbi Marc Schneier
Matthew Bronfman Robert P. Kogod Jeff Schoenfeld
Steven M. Cohen Sidney Kohl Jeffrey Schwarz
Jerome Congress Jonathan Kolber William J. Schwartz
Rabbi Rachel Cowan Peter S. Kolevzon Jack Silver
Lester Crown Rabbi Irwin Kula Rabbi Joel Thal Simonds
Charles de Gunzburg Yehuda Kurtzer Rabbi Felicia L. Sol
Scott Delman Sheila Lambert Jeffrey R. Solomon
Alan M. Dershowitz Burton Lehman Ambassador Alan D. Solomont (ret.)
Thomas A. Dine Marvin Lender Alan P. Solow
Rabbi Denise L. Eger Rabbi Marion Lev Cohen Steven L. Spiegel
Joel S. Ehrenkranz Bruce Levenson C. Michael Spero
Warren Eisenberg Jacqueline Levine Joan E. Spero
Rabbi David Ellenson Hon. Mel Levine Marc Stanley
Ambassador Edward E. Elson Risa A. Levine Susan Stern
Alfred Engelberg Rabbi Robert Levine Judith Stern Peck
Rabbi Edward Feinstein Rabbi Joy Levitt Cary Sucoff
Irwin S. Field Geoffrey H. Lewis Joel D. Tauber
Rabbi Karen L. Fox Robert K. Lifton Roger Tilles
Hon. Barney Frank Deborah E. Lipstadt Bob Unger
Henry A. Freedman Dana Linden Jeanie Ungerleider
Brad Friedman Jonathan Lopatin Rabbi Burton L. Visotzky
Stanley Friedman William Mack James E. Walker, III
Rabbi Laura Geller Rabbi J. Rolando Matalon Howard Weingrow
Michael Gelman Peter May Melvyn I. Weiss
Susie Gelman Mike Medavoy Barry A. Weprin
Ernest Ginsberg Donald Meltzer Martin J. Whitman
Stanley P. Gold Robert B. Menschel Elaine Wolfensohn
Jeremy S. Goldberg Robert Merson James D. Wolfensohn
H.P. Goldfield Arthur Miller Musa Yenni
Abner Goldstine Irving Morris Rabbi Eric Yoffie
E. Robert Goodkind Harriet Mouchly-Weiss Michael D. Young
Bob Gordon Burt Neuborne

 

About Philip Weiss

Philip Weiss is Founder and Co-Editor of Mondoweiss.net.

Posted in Israel/Palestine

2 comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

Scroll To Top