Jerusalem (AFP) – Washington’s support for a new Palestinian government backed by Israel’s Islamist foe Hamas, has left the Jewish state feeling betrayed, triggering a new crisis with its closest ally.
Several Israeli ministers expressed public anger on Tuesday after the US State Department said it was willing to work with the new Palestinian unity government put together by the West Bank leadership and Gaza’s Hamas rulers.
Technocratic in nature, the new government was sworn in on Monday in front of president Mahmud Abbas, with Washington offering its backing several hours later.
Israel admitted it was “deeply disappointed.”
“I have to say I do not understand this American announcement,” said Intelligence Minister Yuval Steinitz, accusing Washington of saying one thing behind closed doors and another in public.
“You cannot present it as a Hamas government internally, then present it publically as a government of technocrats,” he told army radio.
“If these (ministers) are people who identify with Hamas, Hamas identifies with them and appointed them, then they are representatives of Hamas. This is a Hamas government, and Hamas is a terror organisation,” he said.
Speaking to reporters on Monday, State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki said the new cabinet would be judged “by its actions.”
“At this point, it appears that president Abbas has formed an interim technocratic government that does not include ministers affiliated with Hamas,” she said.
“With what we know now, we will work with this government.”
– ‘US capitulation’ –
The US endorsement was viewed as a major blow for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who had on Sunday urged the international community not to rush into recognising the new government, which he said would only “strengthen terror.”
“Unfortunately, American naivety has broken all records,” said Communications Minister Gilad Erdan, a cabinet hardliner who is close to Netanyahu.
“Collaborating with Hamas, which is defined as a terror organisation in the United States, is simply unthinkable.
“US capitulation to Palestinian tactics badly damages the chance of ever returning to negotiations and will cause Israel to take unilateral steps to defend its citizens from the government of terror which Abu Mazen (Abbas) has set up.”
Public radio said Netanyahu was feeling “betrayed and deceived,” particularly as he had assured his security cabinet that US Secretary of State John Kerry had promised him Washington would not recognise the new government immediately.
“And it wasn’t immediate — it was five hours later that this recognition took place,” the radio noted ironically.
A senior political official quoted by the Israel Hayom freesheet, widely regarded as Netanyahu’s mouthpiece, said the US move was “like a knife in the back.”
– ‘Answer with annexation’ –
Israeli commentators said the Palestinians had chalked up a “major success” in driving a new wedge between Israel and its US ally.
The relationship was already under scrutiny following the collapse of Kerry’s peace efforts, with Washington pointing to Israel’s “rampant settlement activity” as a key element in the collapse of US-brokered talks with the Palestinians.
With the peace process in tatters, hardliners within Netanyahu’s rightwing coalition have been pushing for Israel to take unilateral steps such as the annexation of the main Jewish settlement blocs in the occupied West Bank.
Economy Minister Naftali Bennett, head of the far-right Jewish Home party called on Monday for a tough response to the Palestinians formation of a “government of terrorists in suits”.
“The time has come to move from defence to attack, to do what is good for Israel. The sovereignty plan which we have proposed is the only solution today for Palestinian rejectionism of peace,” he said.
The security cabinet agreed on Monday to set up a team to examine the annexation option, but Yediot Aharonot commentator Shimon Shiffer said the move was a sop to Bennett and other hardliners rather than a serious policy change.
So far, Israel has imposed only limited sanctions on the Palestinians in response to the unity government.
It has frozen the transfer of $5.8 million of the $117 million it collects in taxes each month on behalf of the Palestinian Authority, and limited the new ministers’ freedom of movement between Gaza and the West Bank.
And even though it has pledged not to negotiate with the new government, it has not vetoed contact with Palestinian leaders, including Abbas, public radio said.
THE WORLD COMMUNITIES MUST RECOGNIZE THE PALESTINIAN GOVERNMENT WITHOUT HESITATION BUT WITH FULL CONSCIOUSNESS.
Palestinian leader Mahmud Abbas gives a press conference.
Jerusalem (AFP) – World governments should not rush to approve the new Palestinian cabinet, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said Sunday, after the Palestinians accused the Jewish state of punishing them over a unity deal.
“I call on all responsible elements within the international community not to hurry to recognise the Palestinian government that Hamas is part of, and which relies on Hamas,” the rightwing premier told ministers at the weekly cabinet meeting, saying it would “strengthen terror”.
Palestinian president Mahmud Abbas has said the new government, which is to be sworn in on Monday in Ramallah, will be a government of political independents that will reject violence, recognise Israel and abide by all existing agreements.
Although the formal line-up has not yet been made public, it has been pieced together by Abbas’s mainstream Fatah movement and Gaza’s Islamist Hamas rulers in line with a reconciliation deal inked in April.
Technocratic in nature, it will not have a political mandate but will be tasked with organising elections within six months.
According to a draft obtained by AFP, the new government will have 17 ministers, five of them from Gaza, and will be headed by Rami Hamdallah who will also hold the interior portfolio.
LOOK AT GAZA AND ALL OF YOU WILL UNDERSTAND WHY I AM IN CONSTANT PAIN!
I AGREED TO BE CREAMED THE 3rd TIME WHEN THE PETITION SIGNATURES REACH 1,948 TO SIGNIFY NAKBA THE YEAR OF OCCUPATION.
Gaza in Plain Language—Revisited. Honoring the March to Gaza. Now on March 4th, 2011
WHERE IS THE WORLD CONSCIOUSNESS ARE YOU STILL GOING TO BE SILENCE?
Ex-Congresswoman Ms McKinney said,”In the fight against bigotry, we stand together, and we must. In the fight against injustice, we stand together, and we must. In the fight against intimidation, we stand together, and we must. After all, a government that launches wars to steal another person’s birthright will do anything to any of us.”
THE VOICES I HEARD LOUD AND CLEAR IS CALLING FOR A WORLDWIDE MOVEMENT TO LIBERATE PALESTINE!THE WORLD COMMUNITIES MUST RECOGNIZE THE PALESTINIAN GOVERNMENT WITHOUT HESITATION BUT WITH FULL CONSCIOUSNESS.
YES, WE ALL MUST STAND TOGETHER AS ONE UNITED PEOPLE TO DEFEAT THE EVIL ZIONIST JEWS IF NOT THAT WILL BE THE DEMISE OF OUR ONE WORLD!
Time for New Palestinian Political Strategy
There is a dire need for an immediate new more assertive Palestinian political strategy. There is an urgent need for a new more effective Palestinian election, involving not only Palestinians under Israeli occupation, but also Palestinians in all Palestinian refugee camps and in exile, to choose a more representing political body, who would sincerely and assertively fight for the Palestinian rights on the international arena. The 17 years old Palestinian negotiating team with its futile negotiate-only mindset needs to be dismantled and be replaced with another team who is ready to negotiate only after Israel withdraws back to 1967 borders. The effectiveness of this new Palestinian body depends on the Arab League re-instating the Palestinian issue as the major Arab cause in totality and to support Palestinians in every form of resistance.
Further, and most important, the legitimate armed resistance to Israeli occupation must be re-introduced alongside the political struggle as an indispensable method for liberation. Aggressive armed resistance to the Israeli occupation is the only deterrent Palestinians have to stop Israeli expansion. The Egyptian October 1973 War liberating Suez Canal and Hezbollah’s liberation of south Lebanon in 2000 serve as good examples for the saying “what was stolen by force could not be regained except by force”.